Jun 14, 2010, 12:05 AM // 00:05
|
#21
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Jun 2010
Guild: Spirit of Faith[HOPE]
Profession: R/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Invertation
Perhaps an expansion of tamable pets, but not everything tamable.
Aatxe, anyone?
|
Yeah, I mean(thought it would be awesome), having rangers run around with a creature such as a jade armor, glint, aataxe, etc. would be... well insane.
Don't get me wrong, I mean I'd love the idea to have my own pet aataxe murdering everyone who pisses me off, but really, it would be too much.
Instead make creatures such as devourers tameable
|
|
|
Jun 14, 2010, 06:31 AM // 06:31
|
#22
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Nov 2005
Profession: E/Mo
|
Old Mac has a pet devourer, therefore he must be a haxxor.
on topic: if they were scaled down to the size of regular pets and not retain their monster skillbars it wouldn't be OP. (except for semi intelligent races such as heket/naga/etc which should remain off limits.) Not going to happen of course but I can always pretend I have a pet dinosaur. =)
|
|
|
Jun 14, 2010, 11:19 AM // 11:19
|
#23
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Guild: Our Crabs Know True [LOVE]
Profession: R/
|
All the pets are animals. None are 'monsters'. Although some of the monsters can be fit into an animal definition, there aren't many, and most of those are sentient. Sure, it would be neat, but it doesn't fit with the idea of what the pet is.
|
|
|
Jun 14, 2010, 11:36 AM // 11:36
|
#24
|
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Holland
Profession: Rt/
|
taming Kuunavang. For the full team.
Or letting MOX taming an other Golem....
And the double centaur
A MM with a Stygian Underlord
And of course a seige worm
Idea is nice but still
/not signed
|
|
|
Jun 14, 2010, 02:19 PM // 14:19
|
#25
|
Furnace Stoker
Join Date: Oct 2006
Guild: GWAR
Profession: Me/Mo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StormX
Old Mac has a pet devourer, therefore he must be a haxxor.
on topic: if they were scaled down to the size of regular pets and not retain their monster skillbars it wouldn't be OP. (except for semi intelligent races such as heket/naga/etc which should remain off limits.) Not going to happen of course but I can always pretend I have a pet dinosaur. =)
|
Be good to have a devourer.
Seem to remember you have to get a devourer egg for Mac in pre and then when you get to the shiver peaks he has his pet devourer that he lends you for a mission.
It's similar to how you get the black moa chick minipet I guess.
Be nice if they had the time to do the programming and added more animal companions we could obtain that way.
If its not ott in power there isn't really a reason not to allow players more variety.
|
|
|
Jun 14, 2010, 04:28 PM // 16:28
|
#26
|
Academy Page
|
I might be able to understand taming them as a pet, but they should have no skills, and simply act the way any other pet would.
|
|
|
Jun 14, 2010, 05:31 PM // 17:31
|
#27
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Italy
Profession: Mo/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gremlin
Be good to have a devourer.
Seem to remember you have to get a devourer egg for Mac in pre and then when you get to the shiver peaks he has his pet devourer that he lends you for a mission.
|
Yes, you gave him a devourer egg because you killed his bull in Lady Althea's quest.
You find him also in the Breach (ascalon post searing), for the mission "Army Life" iirc., with his pet devourer. You have to save him from the charrs nearby.
|
|
|
Jun 14, 2010, 07:00 PM // 19:00
|
#28
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Ontario, Canada
Guild: Catching Jellyfish With [소N트T ]
Profession: Me/Rt
|
Would be fun to fill our Zaishen Menagerie............
|
|
|
Jun 15, 2010, 12:42 PM // 12:42
|
#29
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Blighty
Guild: The Legion of the Blue Blade
Profession: R/Mo
|
7 E/Rs with Savanah Heat and a Flame Djinn pet each
1 E/Mo Infuser
Goodbye PvE.
|
|
|
Jun 15, 2010, 04:27 PM // 16:27
|
#30
|
Forge Runner
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Right here
Guild: Ende
|
All I have to say for that is "LFG to tame Rotscale". As people have stated that Bosses are excluded... Rotscale isnt one
|
|
|
Jun 15, 2010, 04:30 PM // 16:30
|
#31
|
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Netherlands
Guild: Not going to keep up with that anymore
Profession: R/
|
This suggestion made me lol.
|
|
|
Jun 16, 2010, 11:28 AM // 11:28
|
#32
|
Desert Nomad
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rushin Roulette
All I have to say for that is "LFG to tame Rotscale". As people have stated that Bosses are excluded... Rotscale isnt one
|
Yes, but figure a generic bone dragon pet. Or whatever else. Really it's out of the pet concept in my opinion. They could expand the list of tamables, but just a little bit, nothin more.
/not signed
|
|
|
Jun 17, 2010, 08:46 PM // 20:46
|
#33
|
Forge Runner
|
How is everyone running */R fun?
|
|
|
Jun 17, 2010, 10:34 PM // 22:34
|
#34
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Jan 2010
Guild: [Pink]
Profession: P/
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lishi
How is everyone running */R fun?
|
fun is subjective. To me, being able to tame a roaring ether for my mesmer or a diamond djinn for my para would be really fun but if you think that many people having the same secondary profession would not be fun... then whatever, its your opinion i suppose.
I would also like to point out that in the OP, I mentioned that powerful beasts would not be tameable (or tamable? I think i misspelled it in the title...). This would include such creatures as bosses, aaxtes, rotscale, kuunevang, etc. Also, I could see how it having SF eles tame a flame djinn could be problematic in a team setting. I mentioned as a possible limit in the main post that creatures could be limited to one elite skill and a normal skill of the owner's choosing but I now think that it would be better if the creature were just limited to a single non-elite of the owner's choosing (a skill that belonged to that creature that is). And of course, as I said in the OP, creatures could be leveled downward to stop them from being "overpowered."
|
|
|
Jun 29, 2010, 12:42 PM // 12:42
|
#35
|
Academy Page
Join Date: Mar 2009
Guild: The White Seed
|
/sign if the tamed creature doesn't have it's skill bar anymore, but just behave as a normal pet would.
So we can have any cool-looking pet, but no abuse, and anet doesn't have to change everything in the game.
|
|
|
Jun 29, 2010, 02:51 PM // 14:51
|
#36
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Jan 2010
Guild: eeew
Profession: N/Rt
|
I'd rather see myself having 2 pets instead of one. Or even also one that could attack from a distance.
|
|
|
Jul 02, 2010, 08:18 PM // 20:18
|
#37
|
Pre-Searing Cadet
Join Date: Jun 2007
Guild: Guards Of Denravi
Profession: W/Mo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby2
Tamable female Norn
/win
/signed
|
lol isnt that the same as a hero? (Jora?)
|
|
|
Jul 03, 2010, 03:21 PM // 15:21
|
#38
|
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Jun 2010
Guild: Spirit of Faith[HOPE]
Profession: R/
|
I just thought of the idea of having a pet bone dragon....
/signed
|
|
|
Jul 08, 2010, 10:28 AM // 10:28
|
#39
|
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Apr 2009
Guild: FaZ
Profession: D/
|
I would tame Dhuum.
|
|
|
Jul 08, 2010, 10:34 AM // 10:34
|
#40
|
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Nov 2005
Guild: The Imperial Guards of Istan [TIGI]
Profession: N/
|
It could be cool to have a tamed wurm or djinn or ice elemental or terrorweb dryder or even a maguuma spider, but where is the logic? All of these are hostile, some even sentient, why would they be willing to be tamed? The tamable animals are all neutral by default and just go minding their own business. They only fight if you attack them, and then struggle a bit against the taming itself.
/notsigned
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:18 AM // 06:18.
|